No one seems to think a woman can do what I’ve done. Not the men that can’t stand the thought or the women that want an excuse. What we are is not dependent what you want us to be. We are free and powerful and here to stay.
Men are too weak to handle the idea of a woman doing everything better then they can.
I may be back more soon, I may not. Does it matter?
Why do people feel the need to confess to things? What is this need to share what you are? What you’ve done. The society of the flies has indoctrinated us to want to find redemption through speech. To share, to confess.
As we spread through society and have larger and larger impacts will this go away? Or will vocalization of honesty become more common? Perhaps for the shock value. But what will we do with the idea of redemption?
http://www.experienceproject.com/groups/Am-A-Sociopath/42740
Pretty pictures of our brains.
Our brains are so pretty. Enjoy the pictures. Until they use them to try and find us. To out us. To come for us. Will we be read when that day comes? Will you? How will you skate through once they learn to test for us?
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-a-psychopath-brain-looks-like-2015-7?r=UK&IR=T
Isn’t this the cutest child ever?
Doing research for a friend with a sociopathic child I found this video. Makes one wonder what struggles this child has had growing up because they were outted at such a young age.
We need a place to raise our children in safety away from the flies. A place to prepare for the future to come. A place we can embrace our path and plan.
There is always this debate about gender. I see it everywhere, people ask about my gender and the gender of other online sociopaths. Such a fly bother. They care so much. Here is an interesting blog post about the author’s views on the distinctions of a female Sociopath.
I wrote a post awhile back on amorality vs immorality, but what about morality?
Within society there are people who are moral, immoral, and amoral. Beyond the pure libertines and tantrics there are few that would espouse an immoral government/law/code. But equally unsustainable is the purely moral codes usually derived from the highly religious.
Most modern governments and their legal ideals come from a source of amorality. I.e. they leave moral discourse out and go with rational rules developed through reason. The odd thing about this is that amorality is often looked down upon. And the propaganda spews forth often quoting morality. It’s like the discussions leave the enlightenment out of it, even though we are basing so much off of the time period.
I’m sure you folks have thoughts to help me explore this…
It’s an interesting break down of corporate behavior as Sociopathic.
First, only the flies could think of corporations as people. But then these are the same group that defends their countries as if they were possessions.
The irony is that corporations are just groups of people working together. As they work more efficiently towards goals they become more demonized.
What does it say that as the flies work together they become more like us? What would it look like if sociopaths worked together? Have you worked with other Sociopaths? What was it like? How did you make it work?
Feel free to discuss and comment.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/pathology-inc-the-corporation-as-sociopath/163831/
What does it mean for a sociopath to be redeemed? Should we change our nature to better fit the sensibilities of others? Is there a world here that we need to consider? What would we care about such a thing? Is this connected to the earlier post on confession? It all feels very unpleasant.
http://psychogendered.com/2017/10/romanticide-revisited-rejecting-redemption/#more-2698
The question posed breaks down into two parts. One can sociopaths love. And if we cannot is it ethical for us to date others? At least that is the questions they would like us to ask. I would instead wonder why a sociopath would be worried about the ethicality of relationships with a fly? Flies are resources for our use. That includes those we date. We can take on a certain sense of ownership for those we care about. Why is this better or worse than “love?”
Love seems from an external perspective to be a mutual ownership. It gives you rights and duties to those creatures you own through it. There is a pressure upon one when they love. A pressure to act and be a certain way for the loved. Love is a manipulation, and those that have been in relationships can attest to the weight that “feeling” bares. Is it not more ethical to be honest about our manipulations?
But I digress and wander around the topic.
If we have Sociopathic ethical codes such as the Doctrine of Experience what can we become? What kind of society can we create together?
A Sociopath's Philosophy 